Brown University professor Kenneth Miller, the first witness called by the plaintiffs, said pieces of the theory of evolution are subject to debate, such as where gender comes from, but told the court: "There is no controversy within science over the core proposition of evolutionary theory."In any event, I wish people could at least be honest about the reasons for their arguments. I don't appreciate comments such as:On the other hand, he said, "Intelligent design is not a testable theory in any sense and as such it is not accepted by the scientific community."
"This case is about free inquiry in education, not about a religious agenda," argued Patrick Gillen of the Thomas More Law Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan.Of course the case stems from a religious agenda; to suggest otherwise is insulting.
No comments:
Post a Comment